Update, January 9, 2023. The Supreme Court denied certiorari on this case and will not be hearing it.
The Supreme Court will decide tomorrow, Jan. 6, whether to take a case claiming that Biden, Harris, former Vice President Pence and 385 members of Congress violated their oath of office by voting against the proposition (from members of Congress) to investigate claims involving the rigging of the 2020 election. Let’s pray that the court would rule with God’s wisdom.
From The Morning Edition. The Supreme Court has agreed to [decide whether or not to hear] a case that could conceivably — PLEASE consider this the longest of long shots — overturn the election of 2020, throw out all the legislators who voted to certify the results and leave them ineligible to run for office ever again, even for town dogcatcher.
Join others crying out to the Lord day and night.
The case has been added to the docket for, appropriately, January 6, 2023. …
As Joshua Philipp reported in a podcast for EPOCH TV, the case Brunson v. Alma Adams, et. al., alleges that members of Congress who voted against the proposed 10-day audit of the 2020 elections and certifying those results — with no investigation after being “properly warned” of a credible threat from enemies of the Constitution — were violating their oath of office to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic.” It says that “this action unilaterally violated the rights of every citizen of the U.S.A. and perhaps the rights of every person living, and all courts of law.”
If SCOTUS ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, the remedy would conceivably involve removing the sitting President and Vice President and all those representatives and empower the Court to authorize the swearing-in of the rightful President and Vice President. Not kidding; that’s the remedy the plaintiffs are asking for.
The Brunson brothers are an interesting group –- literally a band of brothers, as they play in a trumpet band. Here they are, with their summary of the suit, which was reportedly written by just themselves, without legal counsel (!). …
Find out all the details of this case at https://ralandbrunson.com
The argument in this case is that by not looking into serious allegations of election fraud, those who voted to confirm the results of the 2020 election broke their oath of office and are ineligible to run for any elected office again. …
The suit names President Biden, VP Harris, former VP Pence, and 385 members of Congress, and, no, that is not a typo. Those are all the members who voted against a proposition for them to investigate claims that “enemies of the Constitution rigged the 2020 election.” So, this case is NOT about whether or not election fraud occurred. It’s about whether or not these people violated their oath by failing to investigate credible allegations of election rigging by enemies of the Constitution –- allegations that had been made by over a hundred of their own colleagues. …
According to Philipp, a finding for the plaintiffs would “also restore Trump to office because he would have been the legitimate candidate.” We’re not yet sure how that part of the argument works but are researching. …
What do you think of this lawsuit? Share your thoughts and prayers below.
(Excerpt from The Morning Edition. Photo Credit: Adam Szuscik on Unsplash)