Over the course of his political career, former President Jair Bolsonaro cozied up with the armed forces in Brazil, handing out thousands of top government jobs to current and former Army officers since 2018 alone. So, on Jan. 8, when the military refused to prop up attempts to overthrow new President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, global observers declared it a win for democracy.
But new details on the Army’s role in the worst attacks in the history of Brazil’s democracy are starting to emerge, painting a different picture. Authorities now say the Army turned a blind eye as rioters plotted their attempted coup, failed to bolster security at federal buildings ahead of the riots, and hampered the police from arresting key players in the hours after the insurrection.
Why We Wrote This
Many South American countries with histories of brutal military dictatorships worked to weaken the role of the armed forces in government. The Jan. 8 capital riots underscore Brazil’s ongoing struggle to keep the military out of politics.
In Brazil, like elsewhere in Latin America, the military has long played a prominent role in politics, historically presenting themselves as a stabilizing power in times of political chaos. While countries like Argentina and Chile demilitarized their governments following brutal military dictatorships, Brazil has struggled to keep the Army out of politics.
“If we don’t see thorough reform, we will continue to run the risk of a coup,” warns Juliano Cortinhas, a former official at Brazil’s defense ministry. “Our democracy will remain under threat.”
The rioters erupted in cheers as soldiers marched into Brazil’s presidential palace on Jan. 8. “The Army is here!” shouted a man draped in a Brazilian flag, pumping a fist in the air.
Inside, people were ransacking Brazil’s halls of power in hopes of provoking a military coup that would annul an election they believe – without evidence – was stolen from former president Jair Bolsonaro. In this moment, they thought the Army was finally answering their pleas; instead, soldiers began handcuffing the insurrectionists.
“The Army handed us over to the police,” one woman said in a social media video filmed on a bus transporting rioters to a police detention center, tears streaming down her face. “Until an hour ago, we trusted the Army, we trusted that it would protect us. And the Army betrayed us.”
Why We Wrote This
Many South American countries with histories of brutal military dictatorships worked to weaken the role of the armed forces in government. The Jan. 8 capital riots underscore Brazil’s ongoing struggle to keep the military out of politics.
Mr. Bolsonaro spent much of his political career currying favor with the armed forces and, during his presidency, handed out thousands of top government jobs to current and former Army officers. Fears mounted in recent months over whether the armed forces would protect the country’s young democracy or side with Mr. Bolsonaro’s fervent supporters. During his time in office, the far-right populist routinely attacked democratic institutions, made baseless claims about election fraud, and spoke nostalgically about Brazil’s brutal military dictatorship, which lasted from 1964 to 1985.
On Jan. 8, when the military refused to prop up attempts to overthrow President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, just a week into his new term, global observers declared the failed coup a win for democracy. But new details on the Army’s role in the worst attacks in the history of Brazil’s democracy point to a more complicated path ahead for South America’s largest country.
In Brazil, like elsewhere in the region, the military has long played a prominent role in politics, historically presenting themselves as a stabilizing power in times of political chaos. But while countries like Argentina and Chile have worked to demilitarize their governments following brutal military rule, Brazil has struggled to keep the Army out of politics since its return to democracy.
Authorities now say the Army was complacent or even complicit in the attacks, turning a blind eye as rioters plotted in camps outside military headquarters, failing to bolster security of federal buildings ahead of the riots, and impeding the police from arresting key organizers in the hours after the insurrection.
As authorities scramble to pinpoint those responsible for planning, inspiring, and financing the attacks on Congress, the Supreme Court, and the presidential offices, larger questions loom over Brazil’s democratic health and whether Lula, as the president is frequently called, can succeed in reigning in an increasingly powerful military that appears unwilling to fully step back from politics.
“This is perhaps the biggest challenge facing Lula,” says Juliano Cortinhas, an international relations professor at the University of Brasília and a former official at Brazil’s defense ministry. But, “if we don’t see thorough reform, we will continue to run the risk of a coup,” he says.
“Our democracy will remain under threat.”
A political project
Brazil’s 21-year dictatorship was marked by censorship, torture, and repression – but few of the military leaders responsible were ever punished. And while steps were taken to shrink the Army’s role in politics, experts say democratically elected governments – including that of Lula, during his first two terms in office from 2003 to 2010 – didn’t do enough to rein in the military’s power.
“That was the left’s greatest error – not bringing the military under control,” says Mr. Cortinhas, noting both Lula and his successor, Dilma Rousseff, treaded too carefully in bids to avoid confrontation or revolt. “They chose not to deal with the problem at the time. And it just snowballed.”
Boundaries between the Army and politics further deteriorated under Mr. Bolsonaro, who handed over more power to the military in an effort to win their loyalty. In an unprecedented move, he even asked the Army to monitor and audit last year’s presidential votes.
But the military’s close ties with Mr. Bolsonaro have eroded public trust and tarnished its image in the eyes of many Brazilians. A global survey of 28 countries placed Brazil near the bottom of the list when it comes to trust in the armed forces.
“The military has become a tool of the right – and what happened in Brasília is proof,” says Daniela Maia, a pet groomer in Rio de Janeiro who voted for Lula “The Army has sold out.”
Even among more conservative Brazilians, the Army’s role in this month’s attacks has raised questions.
“The Army did nothing,” says Ana Evelin Rodrigues, a hairdresser in Rio, who supported Mr. Bolsonaro but condemns the Jan. 8 violence. “I believe in the military. … But they stood by as the vandalism happened.”
Even if Lula takes action, the military may not retreat quickly from politics. Military candidates made inroads in last year’s elections, consolidating the Army’s political presence. Gen. Hamilton Mourão, who served as Mr. Bolsonaro’s vice president, won a seat in the Senate, while Gen. Eduardo Pazuello, who led Brazil’s botched response to the pandemic as health minister under Mr. Bolsonaro, was elected to Congress.
Such electoral victories allow the military to amass political power without challenging democratic norms, says Army Reserve Col. Marcelo Pimental, who has written about the military’s role in Brazilian politics. “There is no need for a coup – the military wants to win elections,” he says. “There is a political project underway.”
Antonio Cascio/Reuters
Failure to respond
Authorities in the federal government have been quick to blame the attacks in Brasília this month on poor security planning and a sluggish response by police and military officials. Following the riots, Lula accused “conniving agents” within the armed forces of facilitating the riots.
“I am convinced that the door of the Planalto Palace was opened for these people,” he told reporters, referring to the presidential offices. “Someone facilitated their entry.”
For 10 weeks before the riots, demonstrators camped out in tent cities outside military buildings across the country, protesting Mr. Bolsonaro’s narrow defeat in the October 2022 runoff election. Claiming the vote was rigged to favor the left, they demanded the military stop Lula from taking power on Jan. 1.
While the Army did not yield to these demands, experts say it sent mixed signals when it failed to dismantle the tent cities. Authorities now believe plans to storm federal buildings were hatched in the camp in Brasília, just meters from the military’s headquarters.
“These camps were set up with the authorization – and even the protection – of senior commanders,” says Colonel Pimental. He says it is highly unusual for the Army to allow a political demonstration in a military area. “This literally brings politics to the doorstep of the Army barracks.”
Authorities are questioning why protesters could so easily break into the presidential palace, which is normally guarded by a unit of military troops made up of roughly 900 officers, according to experts. On Jan. 8, despite intelligence agencies issuing warnings of possible violence, just 36 officers were on duty.
“The military likely didn’t order the attack. But they closed their eyes and let it happen,” says João Roberto Martins Filho, a political science professor at the Federal University of São Carlos and author of several books on Brazil’s military.
Videos of the attack appear to show officers hindering the arrest of rioters. In the hours following the riots, top military officials blocked police access to the protest camp, which facilitated rioters fleeing arrest.
Lula now faces the tall task of holding the military to account and rooting out officers sympathetic to the far-right from top posts within his government. Many citizens, rattled by the physical attacks on their democracy, are looking for a firm response.
“I want to see the military doing its job and serving the people,” says Ms. Maia, the pet groomer.
When he took office, Lula struck a conciliatory tone, stopping short of reshuffling the country’s Defense Ministry – long under the control of the military – and even appointing an ally of the Army as minister.
Following the riots, the leftist vowed to “demilitarize” the government’s defense apparatus, placing his personal security in the hands of police, and taking control away from the military. He also tasked the Justice Ministry with bringing order to the capital.
Yet, some Brazilians don’t see empowering the military as a bad thing. Even with trust in the armed forces dwindling, Brazilians appear to have even less confidence in other authorities: just 6% trust political parties, while 63% believe in the armed forces, shows a 2021 survey by Brazilian think tank Fundação Getulio Vargas.
For Sebastião de Jesus, a building superintendent in Rio, the military isn’t a threat. He lived through Brazil’s dictatorship and isn’t interested in another assault on democracy. But he sees the military as Brazil’s protector.
“It’s hard to know who to trust – the politicians are all the same,” he says. “But I trust the military. They have always looked out for the people.”