The current pitched battles between protesters and riot police in Tbilisi, Georgia’s capital, are the sharpest confrontation in many years between the country’s often fiery pro-Western opposition and its more conservative stability-oriented government.
The most direct cause of the unrest is government legislation that would require politically active civil-society groups and media that receive more than 20% of their funding from abroad to register as “foreign agents.”
Why We Wrote This
As its huge neighbor wages war in Ukraine, Georgia is finding its own society polarizing between those who distrust Russia and those who want to avoid entanglement in the West’s anti-Kremlin efforts.
After two nights of violent protests, the government appeared to back down and announced that it will scrap the legislation. But the opposition says that protesters will keep the pressure going until it does. It’s a clear sign that amid the regional strains of the war in Ukraine, their dissatisfaction with what they see as the Russia-friendly government runs much deeper than just unhappiness over a single proposed law.
“Our government and parliament decided to adopt laws that have nothing democratic about them and are anti-European in their essence,” says Murtaz Shaluashvili, an activist with the opposition party United National Movement. “We consider these to be Russian laws, the same ones that destroyed democracy in Russia after they were introduced. Our authorities have the same intentions, and we do not trust them.”
The cobbled streets of Tbilisi, the capital of the Caucasus republic of Georgia, have seen a lot of political turmoil since the fall of the USSR three decades ago.
But the current round of pitched battles between protesters and riot police near the country’s parliament, on picturesque Rustaveli Avenue, is the sharpest confrontation in many years between Georgia’s often fiery pro-Western opposition and the more conservative stability-oriented government, which currently holds a comfortable majority in parliament.
The most direct cause of the unrest is government-authored legislation that would require politically active civil-society groups and media that receive more than 20% of their funding from abroad to register as “foreign agents.” That would subject them to curbs very similar to those that have been in effect in Russia for around a decade.
Why We Wrote This
As its huge neighbor wages war in Ukraine, Georgia is finding its own society polarizing between those who distrust Russia and those who want to avoid entanglement in the West’s anti-Kremlin efforts.
After two nights of violent protests, the government appeared to back down and announced that it will scrap the legislation. But because the Georgian parliament already passed the “foreign agent” bill on its first reading on Tuesday, it cannot kill it until its second reading, now slated for a plenary session on March 10.
The opposition says protesters will keep the pressure going in the interim. It’s a clear sign that their dissatisfaction with what they see as the Russia-friendly government of the ruling Georgian Dream party – amid the regional strains of war in Ukraine and conflict next door between Armenia and Azerbaijan – runs much deeper than just unhappiness over a single proposed law.
“Our government and parliament decided to adopt laws that have nothing democratic about them and are anti-European in their essence,” says Murtaz Shaluashvili, an activist with the United National Movement, an opposition party founded by Mikheil Saakashvili, who himself led the “Rose Revolution” 20 years ago that unseated pro-Russia president Eduard Shevardnadze. “We consider these to be Russian laws, the same ones that destroyed democracy in Russia after they were introduced. Our authorities have the same intentions, and we do not trust them.”
In the shadow of Russia’s war
Georgia, which fought and lost its own brief war with Russia over two breakaway territories in 2008, has long occupied a nether world between Russia and the West, with a majority of the population repeatedly expressing pro-Western aspirations and governments (including the current one) who want to steer the little country into the European Union.
But the war in Ukraine has illustrated the dangers of antagonizing Russia. At the same time, the influx of around 100,000 often highly skilled Russians fleeing military mobilization and a rush of entrepreneurs looking to reroute trade around Western sanctions, have provided Georgia with economic and political incentives to stay on the sidelines of the Ukraine conflict.
“The Georgian public is overwhelmingly pro-Western but, like any population, wants peace not war,” says Tornike Turmanidze, a senior fellow at the Rondeli Foundation in Tbilisi, which specializes in strategic affairs. “Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has stimulated events. Before the war the Georgian Dream government tried to balance between Russia and the West, but that became difficult after hostilities began. They started warning that the West is trying to drag Georgia into the war against Russia, and using anti-Western rhetoric to play on the public mood.”
In Moscow, commentators say that this week’s violent street clashes with police, which featured an attempt to storm Georgia’s parliament Wednesday night, only confirm the need for laws that limit the ability of foreign interests to fund radical civil-society groups and associated media. Some Russian experts say that yet another “color revolution” instigated by the West is unfolding on the streets of Tbilisi.
“Part of Georgian society is in opposition to the present authorities, about 20%,” says Alexander Skakov, deputy director of the official Institute of Oriental Studies in Moscow. “They only need a pretext to take to the streets and upset stability. The authorities have calmed the situation by withdrawing the legislation. Otherwise things could have gotten much worse, as they have in the past.”
But some argue that the Georgian Dream party is acting, amid regional breakdown and war, to consolidate power by following the well-trodden path established by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russia was in this position just over a decade ago, with authorities arguing that a draft law to compel foreign-funded civil-society groups to register as “foreign agents” and open their financial books was merely in the interests of public disclosure and transparency, and not an oppressive measure.
Irakli Gedenidze/Reuters
After a decade that has seen almost all Russian politically active civil-society groups shut down and most independent media driven out of the country, almost any critical conversation among Russians has become difficult and sometimes dangerous.
“Basically, the Georgian Dream government wants to stay in power forever,” says Dr. Turmanidze. “Like any government leaning toward authoritarianism, they are trying to crack down on democratic elements of society.
“At the same time, they are trying to apply for EU candidate membership, and have been given a list of conditions that Georgia is expected to meet. They have not fulfilled these conditions, and this proposed legislation is in stark contradiction to EU requirements. Right now the government is trying to deceive the EU,” he says. “If they don’t get the candidate status, I think they will just carry on, and perhaps move closer to Russia.”
Income from Russia
Ironically, the war has led to major expansion of Georgia-Russia trade, up 74% in 2022. Several post-Soviet states, including Georgia, as well as big countries like India, have profited by helping Moscow to evade sanctions and import needed Western goods while buying large amounts of cheap Russian commodities in return.
Georgia has also benefited from an influx of Russian draft dodgers and business people seeking to maintain their Russian market connections while avoiding the impact of Western sanctions.
“More than 100,000 Russian citizens came to live in Georgia in the past year, and they manage to get money in various ways, including crypto-wallets, which benefits the Georgian economy,” says Dr. Turmanidze. “Their presence is large enough to have become an economic fact. And our government is using this influx of money from Russia to justify better relations with Moscow. This is what worries the opposition.”