News

FBI admits to seeking informants within the Diocese of Richmond, SSPX – LifeSite

RICHMOND, Virginia (LifeSiteNews) –– The FBI planned to recruit leaders in both a Virginia diocese and the Society of St. Pius X to spy on faithful Catholics.  

The FBI provided information to U.S. Congressman Jim Jordan, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, admitting that it had sought information “derived from at least one undercover employee” seeking to infiltrate religious organizations as “new avenues for tripwire and source development.” Jordan has previously received 18 pages of heavily-redacted documents regarding its investigation of Catholics and the Catholic Church in the Diocese of Richmond, Virginia. Due to the limited response thus far by the FBI to Congressman Jordan’s initial request, the House Judiciary Committee initiated yet another subpoena for further information from the FBI.

— Article continues below Petition —
Tell the FBI to stop surveilling faithful Catholics
  Show Petition Text
8048 have signed the petition.
Let’s get to 9000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text

The FBI is planning to intensify its “assessment” and “mitigation” of “Radical Traditionalist Catholics” over the next 12 to 24 months according to an explosive document from a former agent turned whistleblower.

SIGN & SHARE: Tell the FBI to stop its surviellance of faithful Catholics and focus on the real criminals.

The bombshell 8-page memo was released by former FBI agent Kyle Serpahin on his website UncoveredDC Wednesday. The report, written by an FBI analyst in Richmond, Virginia, was published for internal agency use only on January 23, is titled, “Interest of Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists in Radical-Traditionalist Catholic Ideology Almost Certainly Presents New Mitigation Opportunities.”

Seraphin describes the briefing as an “intelligence product” that, though not being exhaustive, can be used as an initial reference point for the agency to “prop up” future investigations on the subject. He says he obtained the document from an anonymous Baptist employee for the agency.

“This is the first FBI Richmond domain product to focus on the interest of racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists in the Radical Traditional Catholic movement,” the document states. “A search of FBI databases indicates this is also the first FBI finished intelligence product to specifically address this environmental variable.”

SIGN: Politically-motivated witch-hunts of faithful Catholics cannot be allowed in a civilized society

Among the most controversial aspects of the memo is that it directly cites a defamatory study conducted by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) on the subject “Radical Traditional Catholicism.” The SPLC has long been rejected as a legitimate resource for the FBI, Seraphin says, but in this instance, it is being relied on as a primary source to justify its efforts. The memo also references three anti-Catholic smear articles (herehere, and here) published by leftwing websites Salon and The Atlantic to defend its monitoring.

The report alleges that its real motivation is a concern that “Radical Traditionalist Catholic Ideology” possesses an “anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant, anti-LGBT, and white supremacy” outlook, and that this presents a threat to the US’s domestic well-being. The report further claims that adherents to RTC ideology “frequently share language and symbolism, such as crusader references or anti-Semitic discourses” online that pro-life white nationalists also support.

SIGN: The FBI’s smear campaign against Catholics cannot be allowed to stand

Please send this petition to as many concerned Americans as possible – we cannot allow the continued politicization of the FBI.

MORE INFORMATION:

FBI whistleblower releases docs showing agents are surveilling “Radical” Traditional Catholics in Virginia

  Hide Petition Text

According to the FBI response, per Jordan’s April 10 letter, the Bureau’s plan included contacting “mainline Catholic parishes” and the local “diocesan leadership,” as well as leadership within the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) in Richmond to “develop news sources” to report on what the FBI alleges to be “suspicious activity.” Priests associated with the SSPX provide Catholic laity access to the sacraments using the pre-1970 liturgical rituals. Catholics who attend chapels of the SSPX are not members of the organization. 

Jordan outlined in his most recent letter that “[t]his information is outrageous and only reinforced the Committee’s need for all FBI material responsive to our request.” He goes on to emphasize that the FBI admits that the organization has deliberately sought to “enlist Catholic houses of worship as potential sources to monitor and report on their parishioners,” thereby violating the First Amendment rights of Catholics and others within their houses of worship. 

“Based on the limited information produced by the FBI to the Committee, we now know that the FBI relied on at least one undercover agent to produce its analysis, and that the FBI proposed that its agents engage in outreach to Catholic parishes to develop sources among the clergy and church leadership to inform on Americans practicing their faith,” Jordan wrote to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Monday. 

Jordan also reiterated that despite the FBI’s initial response to the revelation, “[w]e know that that the FBI distributed this document to field offices across the country” and that it was “unclear” how many FBI employees have accessed Catholic houses of worship across the country based upon the original Richmond document. 

When reached for comment, the Diocese of Richmond directed LifeSiteNews to its previous statement addressing the original FBI memo that was leaked earlier this year, but did not yet comment on the most recent development.

LifeSiteNews has also reached out to the Society of St. Pius X but has yet to receive a reply. 

UPDATE: This article was updated on April 11 at 3:17 p.m. EST to include a reply from the Diocese of Richmond that was sent after initial publication.

Previous ArticleNext Article