ROME (LifeSiteNews) — Fresh scandal continues to engulf the disgraced Jesuit Father Marko Ivan Rupnik, with Italian media reporting that he owns most of a company turning over millions of euros, in direct violation of his vows and apparently without informing his superiors.
Italian outlet Domani reported April 14 that Fr. Rupnik is listed as owning 90% of an art company which he founded in 2007. The company is named Rossoroblu — a word formed by joining the Italian words for red, gold and blue, which are Rupnik’s notable colors found throughout his extensive portfolio around the world.
It exists “for the creation and installation, in the workshop and on site, of mosaics, stained glass, frescoes, murals, sculptures, paintings in all the various techniques and arts.”
According to Domani, whose report was based on an extensive month-long investigation, the company is listed at the same address as the Aletti Center, the art center which Rupnik has directed since 1993.
Rupnik has been accused of psychologically and sexually abusing 20 religious sisters in the Loyola Community in Slovenia, of which he was a co-founder. After the Jesuit Order issued an open call for any more victims to come forward in December 2022, a further 15 people accused the priest of having abused them, with male victims also coming forward.
As extensively reported by LifeSite, Rupnik was also automatically excommunicated and found guilty by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’s court of absolving in confession a woman with whom he had sexual relations. He subsequently had the penalty revoked.
READ: Fr. Rupnik’s artwork at Lourdes shrine under review following abuse allegations
Throughout his extended and lauded career in Rome spanning many decades, the Jesuit has been leading the Rossoroblu company, owning 90% of it, with the remaining 10% being owned by Manuela Viezzoli, who is a close friend of Rupnik’s and a member of his Aletti Center.
Domani’s extensive research revealed that Rossoroblu was consistently profitable. Founded by Rupnik and Viezzoli in 2007, the company had 15 employees by the end of 2022, according to records studied by Domani.
It has enjoyed consistent growth since its inception, having recorded a turnover of €1,176,500 and a profit of €119,607 in 2021. This built upon consistent growth seen in previous years.
Meanwhile over 200 art projects were performed by the Aletti Center from 2000 through 2022. The Aletti Center has two fundraising foundations to support its work: the Agape Foundation in Rome, and the Aletti Center Foundation in Rupnik’s native Slovenia.
The president of the Pontifical Academy for Life (PAV) has described assisted suicide as sometimes being the “greatest common good concretely possible” contrary to the Catholic Church’s strenuous condemnation of the practice.
This betrayal of the Catholic faith by Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia is not for the first time, with the PAV repeatedly causing scandal under his watch by:
- recently appointing a notorious pro-abortion atheist to the organization
- claiming contraception and artificial insemination are sometimes acceptable
- insisting that priests could accompany people through assisted-suicide, and
- that Italy’s pro-abortion law is a “pillar” of the country’s social life.
SIGN: Pope Francis must remove Abp. Paglia from the Pontifical Academy for Life
“Personally, I would not practice suicide assistance,” Archbishop Paglia told an Italian journalism conference last week, “but I understand that legal mediation may be the greatest common good concretely possible under the conditions we find ourselves in.”
Accepting an anti-life Italian court ruling that specified when assisted-suicide is permitted, the archbishop claimed “it is not to be ruled out that in our society a legal mediation is feasible that would allow assistance to suicide under the conditions specified by Constitutional Court Sentence 242/2019…”
From the outset of his presentation in Perugia, Paglia also undermined the authority of the Catholic Church on matters of faith and morals, stating: “First of all, I would like to clarify that the Catholic Church is not that it has a ready-made, prepackaged package of truths, as if it were a dispenser of truth pills.”
SIGN: Abp. Paglia must be removed from the Pontifical Academy for Life
The PAV issued a statement on Monday trying to clarify the archbishop’s remarks, insisting that Paglia “reiterates his ‘no’ towards euthanasia and assisted suicide, in full adherence to the Magisterium”.
However, far from denouncing Paglia’s words, the PAV unsurprisingly supported its president. Referencing the Italian court ruling which partially decriminalized euthanasia by outlining exceptions to its illegality, the PAV stated it was in the context of this ruling that Paglia had made his comments.
In this precise and specific context, Msgr. Paglia explained that in his opinion a ‘legal mediation’ (certainly not a moral one) in the direction indicated by the Sentence is possible, maintaining the crime and the conditions under which it is decriminalized, as the same Constitutional Court has asked Parliament to legislate.
The PAV’s fudging of the issue was met with consternation from several Catholic commentators, with liturgist Matthew Hazell, who had highlighted Paglia’s original comments, asking “How hard is it for the @PontAcadLife to just say ‘sorry’ for scandalising the faithful? Indeed, how hard is it to actually adhere to the teaching of the Church on life issues? Are you so incapable of reading the signs of the times & interpreting them in the light of the Gospel?”
The Pontifical Academy for Life has tried & failed to explain @monspaglia‘s remarks. Paglia had spoken about the “accompaniment” needed for the dying, saying “in this context, it is not to be ruled out that in our society a legal mediation is feasible …” https://t.co/C3LU601aA2
— Michael Haynes 🇻🇦 (@MLJHaynes) April 24, 2023
Sorry guys, not good enough. Nowhere near good enough.
Archbishop Paglia’s “opinion” on the possibility of “juridical mediation” regarding euthanasia is still contrary to the Catholic faith, as has been explained already. https://t.co/qMATq0UZrL pic.twitter.com/W8s4zLvkj7— Matthew Hazell (@M_P_Hazell) April 24, 2023
Archbishop Paglia’s comments about assisted suicide being “feasible” are wrong and harmful. It’s the kind of “crack in the wall” that opponents of human life will run with to promote their agenda. The teaching of the Church is clear: Euthanasia is “morally unacceptable.” Period.
— Bishop Thomas Tobin (@ThomasJTobin1) April 24, 2023
SIGN: Abp. Paglia’s presidency of the Pontifical Academy for Life is untenable
It’s vital that the Church and PAV push back against the culture of death, rather than trying to accommodate it and accept a world that where the vulnerable are helped to kill themselves.
Be part of pushing back against the tide and making it clear that there is no room for confusion or betrayal when it comes to the sanctity of human life and the infallibilty of Catholic teaching on the matter.
SIGN AND SHARE THE PETITION WITH FRIENDS & FAMILY
MORE INFORMATION:
Abp. Paglia defends assisted-suicide as ‘greatest common good possible’ for dying people – LifeSiteNews
Company hidden from superiors
Rupnik’s ownership of the company appears to have been kept a closely guarded secret. Speaking to Domani, the priest’s superior, Father Johan Verschueren S.J., denied any knowledge of the company or of Rupnik’s involvement with it.
“This is completely new news for me and also quite shocking,” said Verschueren, “because it is against the vow of poverty.”
For a Jesuit to own such a company is against the vow of poverty: one of the four vows each professed member of the Jesuits must take, with the others being chastity, obedience, and particular obedience to the Pope.
READ: Former nun details years of ‘satanic’ sex abuse by Jesuit priest Fr. Rupnik
This is even noted by the Italian website of the Jesuit order, which writes concerning the Jesuit vow of poverty: “We hold no property or monetary accounts in our personal name: in this way we avoid accumulating unnecessary wealth that could distract us from our mission. It is not poverty as an end in itself, but rather one that is oriented towards mission.”
Verschueren reiterated his disavowal of Rupnik’s company in a further statement to ACI Prensa. “From an ecclesial point of view it is illegal, unless it is proven that the competent ecclesiastical authorities gave permission for an exception,” said Verschueren. “So far, this proof has not been given.”
Verschueren added that it would be “quite logical and completely legal” for the Aletti Center itself to “host a commercial initiative of this nature.” However, “the contrary would be very worrying, for tax reasons,” he said, since “producing and selling a work of art is a commercial activity. It would be illegal not to pay taxes in a transparent manner.”
An additional element is that due to the allegations made against him — which the Jesuits deem highly credible — Rupnik is currently the focus of a fresh investigation by his Jesuit order, which could lead to disciplinary action.
READ: Fr. Rupnik concelebrates Mass in Roman basilica despite ban on public ministry
Fresh restrictions related to the start of this current investigation were placed on Rupnik’s artistic activities in February, as Verschueren revealed that Rupnik’s art is linked to his alleged instances of abuse. Rupnik is now banned from any public artistic actions, “especially towards religious facilities (such as churches, institutions, oratories and chapels, exercise or spirituality houses).”
“I only take measures when there are reasons for risk,” stated Rupnik’s superior. Yet he stopped short of finding issue with the artwork itself, saying that “I asked myself, Johan, is it hard to pray before these mosaics? My response is no. In a way, I’ve been able to separate the art from the artist.”
Verschueren stated in February that Rupnik had rejected previous opportunities to assist the inquiries being made into his actions.
Various rumors have circulated surrounding Rupnik, including that he might soon be laicized. Verschueren has denied such reports, additionally downplaying suggestions that Rupnik might be moved to a Jesuit house of residence in Milan.
The Aletti Center is now subject to an Apostolic Visit from the Diocese of Rome.