News

Title 42 shifted attitudes about migration – south of US border

Eleven-year-old Melissa sits in a yellow schoolhouse on the outskirts of Tijuana, joining the chorus of voices answering a teacher who instructs the class on long division.

While dividing 5,789 by 3 might be tedious for some, Melissa says she’s thrilled to crunch numbers. It’s been almost six months since she and her family fled home – and her studies – in the western Mexican state of Michoacán due to violent threats and relentless extortion.

Her family has been languishing in a migrant shelter, waiting to get an appointment with United States officials to request asylum – a disheartening reality for millions of migrants in northern Mexican border cities over the past three years, since the U.S. issued Title 42. But the shelter pivoted to address this growing need, opening the school, and making this limbo just a little easier on kids like Melissa.

Why We Wrote This

Mexico was never a “migration nation” like the U.S. But American policy written during the pandemic has caused a bottleneck at the border – and forced Mexicans to rethink their obligations to migrants.

“I’m learning again,” she says, grinning.

The new school at the Embajadores de Jesús migrant shelter exemplifies the ways in which Mexican civil society has adapted to increased migrant flows amid Title 42, which virtually sealed off U.S. ports of entry to noncitizens or visa holders and put a traditionally transient population in a holding pattern. Ever since, Mexicans have leaned into flexibility to face the changing populations in their towns and cities and had to rethink the rights of migrants – and their role towards and obligations to them – in ways that will likely outlast Title 42 when it expires May 11.

Previous ArticleNext Article