(LifeSiteNews) — It is easy to cherry-pick the worst behavior of the ideological group you disagree with and highlight it as evidence that the fringes represent the whole. That, unfortunately, is not the case with a video that recently went viral showing an adult woman harassing a 12-year-old boy at a Canadian protest wearing a “Save Canada” ballcap. He stands there awkwardly smiling and shifting uncomfortably as an—again, adult—woman dumps glitter over his head while smiling the smile of someone who recognizes her power:
When she is approached by a police officer who warns her that if she harasses the child again she will be arrested, she brazenly insists that she “isn’t assaulting anyone” and is doing nothing wrong. This is progressive entitlement on full display.
Dumping things on the head of a child who you disagree with isn’t assault and isn’t wrong, you see—because she is entitled to harass and assault those she disagrees with, because she is right and they are wrong. Her smirk says it all. If this were a social conservative harassing a progressive—or worse, a trans activist—it would be all over the front pages and the prime minister would have condemned it by now.
The son of pastor Artur Pawlowski could be facing massive fines and jail time after he preached Bible verses outside a drag queen story time held at a public library over the weekend.
Nathaniel Pawlowski was detained and ticketed on Saturday by Calgary Police Service (CPS) because he was preaching too “close” to the drag event, in an apparent violation of a new and oppressive bylaw.
SIGN: Nathaniel Pawlowski MUST NOT be fined or jailed for protecting kids from Drag Queens
Pawlowski said that he was outside the event to “preach, read the Bible and just speak.”
Video of the incident shows Pawlowski along with his friend Deklan Friesen speaking to a crowd outside the library.
Calgary City Council last month passed a new “Safe and Inclusive Access Bylaw” that disallows “specified protests” both inside and outside all city-owned and affiliated public buildings. Mayor Jyoti Gondek put her full support behind the buffer zone bylaw.
Please tell Mayor Gondek that the bylaw violating Charter freedoms is both unjust and absurd
The bylaw means pastors or concerned parents protesting pro-LGBT events at public buildings are barred from getting within 100 meters of any such location.
Top constitutional lawyer John Carpay recently blasted Calgary City Council for going to “war” against Canadians’ freedoms by using bylaws to target people’s ability to protest events at public facilities, including drag queen performance directed at children.
In an opinion piece published on March 17 in the Western Standard, Carpay said “freedom of expression is meaningless if citizens are only allowed to say what’s approved by the government, or if expression is banished from public spaces.”
Pawlowski noted that his ticket has no penalty listed yet, as police must “review the evidence on me and that they will be stopping by my home to issue charges.”
His ticket does have a mandatory court appearance date. Each charge under Calgary’s bylaw carries a maximum fine of up to $10,000 and up to a year in jail.
SIGN: Nathaniel Pawlowski MUST NOT be fined or jailed for protecting kids from Drag Queens
Pawlowski had asked the police officers if they would also be enforcing “the same law on to the other side with the Antifa protesters”, but nobody was served a ticket except for he and Friesen.
In June 2022, Calgary City Council, under its left-leaning Mayor Jyoti Gondek, amended the city’s bylaws to “specifically prohibit insulting or demeaning behavior, including unwanted sexual advances, or harassing anyone on the basis of age, race, sexual orientation, disability, gender, gender identity or gender expression, among others.”
In February, Gondek vowed to use the bylaw to go after drag queen story hour protesters after some of the events were postponed by pro-family objectors.
In early March, fulfilling her promise, Calgary City Council then passed the bylaw that banned protesting against drag queen story hours or any other “LGBTQ” events held at public facilities.
SIGN: Nathaniel Pawlowski MUST NOT be fined or jailed for protecting kids from Drag Queens
Carpay noted that while there are limits to free speech, “Canadians have every right to express their views in public places, regardless of the content of the expression.”
He also wrote how a 1992 Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. Zundel “explained all communications which convey or attempt to convey meaning are protected by the Charter [of Rights and Freedoms], unless the physical form by which the communication is made (for example, a violent act) excludes protection.”
“The purpose of the Charter’s free expression guarantee is to promote truth, self-fulfillment, and political and social participation. That purpose extends to the protection of minority beliefs which the majority regards as wrong or false,” wrote Carpay.
According to Carpay, Gondek seems to “believe it is wrong or false to oppose drag queen story readings in public libraries.”
“She is entitled to express her views, but not to impose her views on others by effectively banning peaceful public protests through a so-called ‘Safe and Inclusive Access’ bylaw,” noted Carpay.
There exists a “freedom of expression” which includes the “right” to choose “high-visibility locations to hold up signs or banners, sing or chant, hand out literature, gather signatures on a petition, and have a speaker get up on her soapbox,” continued the lawyer.
“Protests are often held at the locations where injustices (or perceived injustices) are actually occurring,” he added.
Christian pastor Derek Reimer was jailed and charged in early March for protesting a children’s drag queen story hour at a public library in Calgary.
Carpay wrote that the city council’s use of “coercive power to relegate peaceful protesters to obscure locations where they cannot be seen or heard,” amounts to “crushing a fundamental Charter freedom on which our democracy depends.”
“The point of protests is to be seen and heard,” wrote Carpay.
Carpay noted that being forced to stand 100 meters away from high-visibility and high-traffic areas “reduces freedom of expression to near irrelevance.”
“Protecting entrances from obstruction is already taken care of by the Criminal Code, and does not require a bylaw that imposes up to $10,000 in fines and up to a year in jail for peacefully protesting less than the length of four swimming pools away from an entrance,” charged Carpay.
According to Carpay, the Charter’s protection for free speech applies to those at the receiving end of a person speaking out.
“Potential listeners who have the right to hear diverse points of view, and to decide for themselves what is true and false rather than having Mayor Gondek decide on their behalf,” said Carpay.
“Calgary’s ‘Safe and Inclusive Access’ bylaw violates the rights of all Calgarians, speakers and listeners, and attacks diversity of thought and belief.”
Carpay noted that “repressive regimes always take great pains to ensure their subjects are kept ‘safe’ from ideas which the regime believes to be wrong or false.”
“In the past – and still today – those living in communist North Korea, national socialist Germany, theocratic Iran, Putin’s Russia, communist China and many other places have been kept very safe from ideas that the regime dislikes,” wrote Carpay.
Carpay noted that in a “free society,” there is no way everyone can be “safe” from hearing one’s opposing views.
“The ‘safety’ which woke activists on Calgary City Council are promising is attractive to those who support children being exposed to drag queens at public libraries,” wrote Carpay.
“But beware of the erosion of freedom, because the demons of censorship cannot be controlled after their release.”
In addition to Carpay, the Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF) has also objected to the new bylaw, and has vowed to commence a legal challenge against the “unconstitutional” policy.
SIGN: Nathaniel Pawlowski MUST NOT be fined or jailed for protecting kids from Drag Queens
MORE INFORMATION:
Pastor Artur Pawlowski’s son detained in Calgary for preaching against drag show – LifeSiteNews
Canadian constitutional lawyer rips Calgary law banning drag queen story hour protests – LifeSiteNews
I’ve seen progressive protestors in action more time than I can count, and entitlement is a fundamental characteristic of their behavior. I’ve seen swarms of protestors physically blocking a university door in order to prevent a speaker from getting to his audience, screaming at and even shoving police when they intervene or attempt de-escalation.
I’ve had my own presentations interrupted by shouting, pot-banging protestors who felt that those attending the speech (one of them in a private, prescheduled room) had no right to hear what they had chosen to hear. At one presentation, topless protestors showed up and attacked one of our vehicles. At another event, they physically barricaded the parking lot so attendees couldn’t park.
In many cases, as I’ve written here before, abortion protestors are fully willing to get violent in order to make their point—which is consistent with their worldview, which permits violence against inconvenient persons.
Trans protestors the world over have grown increasingly violent over the past couple of years, with a feminist speaker in New Zealand recently fearing for her life when she was mobbed. In Canada, when feminist Meghan Murphy was scheduled to speak at the Toronto Public Library, LGBT protestors gathered in front of the building shouting obscenities, with one attendee being told she should “choke and die.”
All that to say that the video of the adult woman harassing the child is not a fringe example. Her behavior is typical of progressive protestors. For all of their sound and fury about human rights, dehumanizing those they disagree with is a fundamental part of their modus operandi.
Compare that, for example, to the comportment of pro-life activists across the country. The best evidence of the pristine good behavior of pro-life activists in Canada is that no matter how hard they tried, pro-abortion politicians couldn’t produce examples of harassment even when advocating for bubble zones around abortion clinics—and indeed, abortion activists have actually been convicted in recent years of faking hate crimes against themselves.
Or compare the behavior of progressive protestors with the Freedom Convoy, which remained peaceful despite relentless media efforts to find someone—anyone—who was violent. It didn’t happen.
Progressive protestors believe that they own the culture and they treat those they disagree with as non-persons who can be mistreated at will. As we see in the video above, not even children are exempt.
