News

No ‘Legal Standing’: SCOTUS Rejects Abortion Pill Challenge

Reading Time: 2 minutes

The Supreme Court has unanimously rejected the case against the abortion pill because the plaintiffs lacked legal standing to sue.

From The Epoch Times. The Supreme Court unanimously rejected a challenge Thursday morning brought by a doctors’ group against the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) loosening of regulations of the abortion pill mifepristone, handing a win to the agency.

Become a Monthly Ministry Partner today.

The court held that those challenging the status of the pill lacked legal standing to do so. …

The 9–0 opinion was written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Justice Clarence Thomas filed a concurring opinion. …

Advocates for mifepristone said the current system by which the drug is provided is safe, while opponents said it puts women at risk by ignoring safety measures that used to be in place. …

The Supreme Court case came after Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, an appointee of President Donald Trump, held in April 2023 that the FDA was wrong to approve mifepristone for public use in 2000. He said the FDA was under political pressure to get the pill on the market and then, after that, had deliberately dragged out judicial review of the drug for years.

Judge Kacsmaryk found the FDA had improperly lifted restrictions related to accessing the drug and issued a preliminary nationwide injunction retroactively staying the FDA’s approval. …

During oral arguments at the Supreme Court on March 26, much of the discussion focused on legal standing, that is, the connection a litigant has to a controversy before the court.

Share your continued prayers for the unborn in the comments below.

(Excerpt from The Epoch Times. Photo Credit: P_Wei/Getty Images Signature via Canva Pro)

Previous ArticleNext Article