BOURNEMOUTH, England (Alliance Defending Freedom) — Poole Magistrates’ Court will hear the case of Adam Smith-Connor, the father and army veteran criminally charged for praying silently near an abortion facility in Bournemouth, on September 17-19.
Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole Council filed the charges on the basis that Smith-Connor was praying within a censored “buffer zone” – an area covering several streets in the town – in which authorities have banned various expressions of pro-life or Christian belief, including through offering help to women in crisis pregnancies, or praying.
See the full text of the Public Spaces Protection Order HERE.
The defence contends that a mere thought cannot amount to a crime, and authorities must not criminalize citizens for the opinions or beliefs they hold in their minds on any given public street.
On the date in question, Smith-Connor prayed silently for approximately three minutes before being approached by police officers. The legal proceedings have continued for almost two years, and the trial is scheduled to take place for three days.
The council has so far run up legal fees – charged to the public purse – in excess of £34,000 to prosecute an offence carrying a maximum fine of £1,000.
‘What is the nature of your prayer?’
Smith-Connor was issued a fixed penalty notice on December 13, 2022. The notice detailed that he had been “praying for his deceased son” a month earlier on November 24, 2022, near an abortion facility on Orphir Road in Bournemouth where an abortion facility censorship zone or “buffer zone” is in place.
During their interaction with Smith-Connor, which was captured on video, officers asked the father of two, “What is the nature of your prayer?”
Smith-Connor, who now regrets having paid for an abortion for his ex-girlfriend in the past, was praying about his experience, about the child whom he lost, and for the men and women facing difficult decisions about abortion today. He prayed with his back to the facility to avoid any impression of approaching or engaging with women using the facility.
A lack of clarity from police
Smith-Connor’s case has unveiled confusion amongst police officers regarding the permissibility of silent prayer in U.K. law.
In a filmed encounter with police on another occasion in which Smith-Connor had silently prayed in the same spot, officers had informed him that he was not breaking the law, remarking, “this is England and it’s a public place and you’re entitled to do that.”
READ: Hookup app Tinder goes all in on abortion, donates thousands to Planned Parenthood
“In various other circumstances, the police and the courts have made it clear that silent prayer is not a criminal act. And yet, BCP Council, which has already conceded that presence is not in itself an offence, has introduced a rights-restricting censorship zone, which they now argue extends to a ban on silent prayer,” said Jeremiah Igunnubole, legal counsel for ADF UK, supporting Smith-Connor’s defense.
In permitting the prosecution of silent prayer, we are sailing into dangerous waters regarding human rights protections in the U.K. Censorship zones are inherently wrong and engender unhelpful legal confusion regarding the right to free thought. Both domestic and international law have long established freedom of thought as an absolute right that must not ever be interfered with by the state.
The Telegraph recently reported that Ministers are considering naming “silent prayer” as a crime in their “buffer zones” guidance – to do so would not only be a legal error, it could open up the floodgates to human rights violations similar to those experienced by Adam Smith-Connor.
A series of British ‘thoughtcrime’ trials
Smith-Connor’s case will mark the third in a series of high-profile cases in which citizens have been tried in court for praying silently in their heads within abortion facility “buffer zones.”
In March 2022, charitable volunteer Isabel Vaughan-Spruce and Catholic priest Father Sean Gough, were both found “not guilty” after facing criminal charges for similar actions to Smith-Connor.
Though being found “not guilty” of breaching the censorship zone or “buffer zone” with her thoughts, Vaughan-Spruce was arrested a second time in March after she prayed silently in the same spot near the abortion facility once again. Six police officers attended the scene. In August 2024, police paid Vaughan-Spruce a settlement of £13,000 for her two unlawful arrests.
Five councils across the U.K. currently have active “buffer zones” or censorship zones banning prayer and offers of charitable help to women on the public streets near abortion facilities.
On March 7, 2023, the U.K. Parliament voted to roll out “buffer zones” around every abortion facility in England & Wales as part of the Public Order Act 2023. The Labour government is expected to implement the zones imminently.
Last month, the Telegraph reported that ministers are considering naming “silent prayer” as a criminal activity within the guidance of the new law.
READ: Celebrities are telling their abortion stories in an attempt to normalize killing unborn babies
Ahead of the trial, Adam Smith-Connor commented:
Nobody should be prosecuted for silent prayer. It is unfathomable that in an apparently free society, I am being criminally charged on the basis of my silent thoughts, in the privacy of my own mind. It’s no different than being tried for a thoughtcrime.
I served for 20 years in the army reserves, including a tour in Afghanistan, to protect the fundamental freedoms that this country is built upon. I continue that spirit of service as a health care professional and church volunteer. It troubles me greatly to see our freedoms eroded to the extent that thoughtcrimes are now being prosecuted in the U.K.
Reprinted with permission from the Alliance Defending Freedom.