Should the FDA promote Covid boosters for babies?
From Conservative Review. Our government believes it’s an emergency necessity to poison our children with proven dangerous gene therapy. Do we feel the same sense of urgency to thwart the plot?
This content is supported by your donations.
Give today.
This month, as we mark the grim three-year anniversary of “15 days to flatten the curve,” the FDA has now utilized emergency use authorization to deem COVID urgent enough to approve a dangerous booster shot on babies for a variant that no longer exists. The breach of the Hippocratic Oath of “first do no harm” and the Nuremberg Code on human experimentation and risk-benefit medical decision-making is large enough for a blind person to see. Yet these policies remain undeterred, and their perpetrators remain unpunished. …
[A] fourth booster of a vaccine that should never have been approved for children even in the thick of COVID was approved by the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee on Tuesday. … How could anyone justify training the immune systems of babies to respond improperly to new variants based on ones that have been extinct since February, according to the CDC? …
The clinical trial for something already proven to be dangerous by a plethora of government data was composed of just 23 children 6 months to 2 years old! And not that we can trust their data, but the companies haven’t even published the clinical outcomes of the patients — just that they have produced antibodies, which as we know, particularly with respiratory viruses that mutate, is not necessarily a good thing if antibodies are produced in the wrong amount and class. …
How can Congress continue to allow the FDA to openly approve failed and dangerous products for children? Because the FDA is the judge, jury, and executioner of all drug approval, the market is forced to rely solely on FDA discretion for safety, thereby boxing out our ability to create a parallel system. …
Finally, we need to move beyond the point where the fox can guard the henhouse by having the companies themselves conduct their own studies. If the federal government is prepared not only to approve a product but to completely fund it, market it, cajole it upon the people, and absolve it of liability, then at a minimum, the safety and efficacy data must be vouched for by a third party not connected to the manufacturer or the government regulators approving it.
Some might suggest that Republicans lack the power to enact these reforms at present. But this should not stop the red states from rejecting these shots. On the anniversary of “Nuremberg Day” last Thursday, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis held a press conference with his surgeon general, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, marking three years since “15 days to flatten the curve.” “These vaccines have a terrible safety profile at this point in the pandemic,” said Ladapo. “You know, I’m not sure anyone should be taking them, and that’s [the] honest truth.” …
Make your voice on this issue heard! Send a message to your officials by clicking here.
Share your prayers and scriptures below.
(Excerpt from Conservative Review. Photo Credit: Michal Bar Haim on Unsplash)